Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has an overall score of 86.5, which is better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 global score. Although the Galaxy M31 and the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were released only 9 months apart, the Galaxy M31 is just a bit thinner and lighter. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy M31 counts with a slightly better looking display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. The Galaxy M31 takes a little bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a very superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 48% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.