Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black and Green | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is much better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a global score of 87.1 against 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 construction is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released just 10 months before.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and Galaxy Note9 feature quite similar processors, and although the Galaxy Note9 has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Note9 features a little sharper display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a superior camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a little bit more memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.