Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a score of 79.3 against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older phone than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but Samsung could make it much lighter and way thinner. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more cores and 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a more vivid screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a bigger aperture for better photos in low light environments, faster video frame rate, a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4065mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.