Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ3 is a little bit better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a 79.6 score against 73.9. Although Xperia XZ3 and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were only released 8 months apart, Xperia XZ3's body is a little bit thicker but also lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit better CPU than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ3 has a better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much better camera than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a lot more MP back camera, faster video frame rate, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.