Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 overall score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released about 10 months before. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2246 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom one, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations, a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a back camera with much more MP.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.