Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is better than OPPO Reno, getting an 82 score against 72.8. The iPhone XR construction is a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the OPPO Reno, and both of them were released with only 7 months difference. The iPhone XR has a little sharper screen than OPPO Reno, although it has a quite smaller display, a quite inferior pixel number in each screen inch and a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792.
The Apple iPhone XR has a greater performance than OPPO Reno, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The OPPO Reno has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory.
The OPPO Reno has superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 3765mAh battery capacity. OPPO Reno has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos, a lot more MP back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.