Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and Green | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 score. The iPhone XS is a a bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the OPPO Reno, even when both were released with only 9 months difference. The iPhone XS features a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a just a little higher pixels density.
IPhone XS has a better hardware performance than OPPO Reno, because although it has 2 less cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The OPPO Reno counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Reno features a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3765mAh battery capacity against 2659mAh. The OPPO Reno captures much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, a lot more MP camera and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.