Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is much better than the OPPO Reno, getting a global score of 80.2 against 72.8. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel is noticeably older than the OPPO Reno, it's body is just a bit thinner and much lighter. The OPPO Reno counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
The Google Pixel has a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixel density. OPPO Reno shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno also has a larger sensor, a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The OPPO Reno counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 3765mAh battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.