Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 score. The Google Pixel 2 XL body is thinner and a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno, even though it was released about a year before. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater pixel density.
The OPPO Reno counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has more internal storage. Google Pixel 2 XL's CPU is very similar to the OPPO Reno one, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno also has a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The OPPO Reno has just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.