Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 score. Google Pixel 3's construction is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno, even when they were only released 8 months apart. The Google Pixel 3 features a little faster processor than OPPO Reno, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 has a bit sharper display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better number of pixels per inch of screen. The OPPO Reno shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures in low-light environments and a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The OPPO Reno has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno features superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.