Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is better than the OPPO Reno, with an 80.7 score against 72.8. Even when the Google Pixel 3 XL and OPPO Reno were only released with a couple of months difference, the Google Pixel 3 XL is thinner and just a little lighter. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher pixel density.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better performance than OPPO Reno, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The OPPO Reno shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno also has a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution, a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture.
The OPPO Reno has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno has a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.