Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno's overall score of 72.8. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has an older 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie. Google Pixel 3a is a noticeably lighter and a little thinner cellphone than the OPPO Reno, although both were only released with a few months difference.
The Google Pixel 3a has a little sharper display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2220px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. The OPPO Reno counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
The OPPO Reno has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno also has more RAM. OPPO Reno counts with greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Reno takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments, a lot more MP camera in the back and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.