Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno's global score of 72.8. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a just a little lighter and a bit thinner device than OPPO Reno, even though they were released only 1 months apart. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a XL has an older 11 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
OPPO Reno features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno also has more RAM. The OPPO Reno features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little better pixels quantity per screen inch, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The OPPO Reno captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the OPPO Reno also has a way more MP back-facing camera, a larger aperture and a way bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures.
OPPO Reno has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno and the Google Pixel 3a XL feature very similar batteries performance, although the Google Pixel 3a XL has just 3700mAh battery capacity against 3765mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.