Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Green | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is better than the OPPO Reno, having a general score of 81.9 against 72.8. Even though the Google Pixel 4 and the OPPO Reno were only released 5 months apart, the Google Pixel 4 is somewhat lighter and a little thinner. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel density.
The Google Pixel 4 has just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
The OPPO Reno features improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 34% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.