Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Green | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than OPPO Reno, with a global score of 87.5 against 72.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is newer, a little lighter and a little thinner than the OPPO Reno.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density. OPPO Reno has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better performance than OPPO Reno, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno captures better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno also counts with a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little longer battery life than OPPO Reno, because it has a 3 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.