Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Green | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than OPPO Reno, with an 89 score against 72.8. The Google Pixel 5 is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and lighter than OPPO Reno. Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a quite greater pixels density. OPPO Reno has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot more megapixels back camera.
Google Pixel 5 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.