Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 general score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. The HTC One M9 construction is somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno, although it's a little thicker and was released 4 years before.
HTC One M9 counts with a brighter display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density. The HTC One M9 features a bit better CPU than OPPO Reno, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bit CPU.
The OPPO Reno features a superior storage to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno counts with longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
The OPPO Reno features a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno also has a way larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a bigger sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.