Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno's overall score of 72.8. Even though the HTC U Ultra is older than the OPPO Reno, it's body is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The OPPO Reno features a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores.
HTC U Ultra features a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. HTC U Ultra has a bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno shoots better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger back camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
The OPPO Reno has improved battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 26 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.