Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is slightly better than OPPO Reno, having a 77.6 score against 72.8. HTC U11's design is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Reno, although it was released many years before. HTC U11 features a bit better CPU than OPPO Reno, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
HTC U11 features a little more vivid display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of display. The OPPO Reno has a superior memory for apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
OPPO Reno takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC U11, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno also has a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
OPPO Reno counts with improved battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 26 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.