Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.2 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2014-05-27 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.26 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G3 is slightly better than OPPO Reno, with a global score of 76.4 against 72.8. The LG G3 is a somewhat lighter phone than OPPO Reno, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but LG G3 has 5.0 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG G3 features a much more vibrant screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The LG G3 has a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Reno, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The OPPO Reno features a greater camera than LG G3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno also has a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos, a lot larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The OPPO Reno features a lot bigger memory for apps and games than LG G3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno features greater battery lifetime than LG G3, because it has a 3765mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.