Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-06-05 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G5 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno, with a 76.1 score against 72.8. The LG G5 is an noticeably older phone than the OPPO Reno, but LG managed to build it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the LG G5 has an older 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G5 counts with a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The OPPO Reno has a bit faster processor than LG G5, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno features a better camera than LG G5, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
The OPPO Reno features a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than LG G5, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno counts with superior battery life than LG G5, because it has a 3765mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.