Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is better than the OPPO Reno, with a overall score of 82.7 against 72.8. LG G8X ThinQ's construction is just a bit thinner but a bit heavier than the OPPO Reno, and they were only released with a couple of months difference. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno. Both have a same size screen, the same pixels density and the same 1080 x 2340 resolution. The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Reno, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The OPPO Reno features a better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Reno also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos, a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better battery life than OPPO Reno, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3765mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.