Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 has a general score of 78.6, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 score. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but LG V10 has the previous 5.1 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie. LG V10 is a notably older and just a little heavier device than the OPPO Reno, but LG could make it a little thinner anyway.
The OPPO Reno features a superior CPU than LG V10, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and they are faster). The LG V10 has a much better display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The LG V10 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG V10, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Reno also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a much higher resolution camera and a much bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
OPPO Reno counts with longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 3765mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.