Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is much better than OPPO Reno's global score of 72.8. These phones come with Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older device than the OPPO Reno, but it is lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. LG V30S ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little faster processor than OPPO Reno, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Reno counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3765mAh battery size. OPPO Reno has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.