Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is better than the OPPO Reno, having a score of 81.3 against 72.8. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than OPPO Reno, although it was released only 12 months before. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Reno, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The OPPO Reno takes better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 48 megapixels resolution and a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
OPPO Reno has just a little better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3765mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.