Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 overall score. LG V40 ThinQ's construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno, even when they were only released 8 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better display pixels density.
OPPO Reno shoots much better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera with way more megapixels.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno features a little longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.