Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Green | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than OPPO Reno, getting an 87.1 score against 72.8. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is newer and a little thinner than the OPPO Reno's, although it is also just a bit heavier.
OPPO Reno has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures slightly better photos and videos than OPPO Reno, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher 60 fps video frame rate, a higher resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has superior battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.