Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and Green | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno, with a score of 86.2 against 72.8. These devices have Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Moto G200 5G is a a bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno, but they are equally thin.
The Moto G200 5G and OPPO Reno both count with very similar screens, because although the Moto G200 5G has a bit worse number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The OPPO Reno features a very superior storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit better performance than OPPO Reno. They have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM. The Moto G200 5G counts with greater battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G captures a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.