Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition has an overall score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 overall score. The Moto Z2 Force Edition design is thinner and much lighter than the OPPO Reno, although it was released around 22 months before. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit faster CPU than OPPO Reno, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit sharper display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display density. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Reno has a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh. The OPPO Reno counts with a way better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno also has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video, a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.