Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and Green | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno, getting a general score of 77.4 against 72.8. Despite of the fact that Moto Z2 Play is older than the OPPO Reno, it's design is thinner and noticeably lighter. The OPPO Reno counts with a little bit better display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little greater pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Moto Z2 Play features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno has a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video definition and the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno also has a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution. OPPO Reno features longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.