Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Green | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno, getting a overall score of 79.8 against 72.8. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola One Hyper is a a little heavier phone than OPPO Reno, but both of them have the same thickness.
OPPO Reno features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno counts with a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the OPPO Reno also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Motorola One Hyper features a better memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper counts with a little longer battery life than OPPO Reno, because it has a 6% more battery capacity.
OPPO Reno shoots clearer videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 48 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.