Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 403 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than the OPPO Reno, with a general score of 79.2 against 72.8. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an older 15 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a notably newer and a lot thinner cellphone than the OPPO Reno, although it is also a little heavier.
OPPO Reno counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. OPPO Reno has a much better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a more MP camera in the back and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.