Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and Green | Meteor grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a global score of 80.3, which is better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 global score. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an older 10 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno, but it's heavier.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a processing unit that's just as good as OPPO Reno's processor, and although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno counts with a bit sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels number in each inch in the display.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
OPPO Reno counts with a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with greater battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.