Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Green | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno, having a 75.8 score against 72.8. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the nubia Red Magic 3S design is a little thicker and heavier than OPPO Reno. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system).
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a display that is very similar to the OPPO Reno one, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a just a bit worse pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots clearer photographs and videos than OPPO Reno, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the same resolution back facing camera and the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher video definition. OPPO Reno and nubia Red Magic 3S both feature quite similar memory for applications and games, they have the same internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has better battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.