Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Green | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the OPPO Reno, with a 79.9 score against 72.8. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's construction is a lot newer and a little bit thinner than the OPPO Reno's, although it's a little bit heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an older 14 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
The OPPO Reno features a very superior CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a just a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little larger screen.
OPPO Reno features a bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G features longer battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3765mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.