Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30s has a score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno's global score of 72.8. Although Galaxy A30s and OPPO Reno were released only 4 months apart, Galaxy A30s is lighter and somewhat thinner. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A30s has 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
OPPO Reno has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno has a more vivid display than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Reno also has a lot greater screen pixels density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The OPPO Reno has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same aperture, the OPPO Reno also has a way higher 48 MP resolution camera and a way higher (4K) video quality. The Galaxy A30s counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3765mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.