Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) is a little bit better than OPPO Reno, with a 75.8 score against 72.8. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) design is thinner and lighter than OPPO Reno, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Galaxy A5 (2017) features a display that is just as good as the OPPO Reno one, because although the Galaxy A5 (2017) has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixel density.
The OPPO Reno has just a little better performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The OPPO Reno has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 3765mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.