Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 global score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has 11 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the Galaxy A51 and OPPO Reno were only released 7 months apart, the Galaxy A51 is just a bit lighter and thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a screen that's just as good as the OPPO Reno one, although the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a little more pixels per inch of screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A51 and OPPO Reno both have incredibly similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A51 and OPPO Reno count with extremely similar cameras, and although the Galaxy A51 has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a 0.5 inches camera sensor and a camera with a 48 mega-pixels.
Galaxy A51 features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a little longer battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.