Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is way better than the OPPO Reno's global score of 72.8. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G construction is newer and just a little thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than OPPO Reno. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A51 5G features a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in OPPO Reno, and although the Galaxy A51 5G has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a display that's very similar to OPPO Reno's display, although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite bigger screen and a little bit higher pixels count in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a better storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has longer battery life than OPPO Reno, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a camera that's very similar to OPPO Reno's camera, and although the Galaxy A51 5G has a tinier aperture, they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality, a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and a same resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.