Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 general score. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer and just a bit thinner than the OPPO Reno's, but it is just a bit heavier.
The Galaxy A52 5G and OPPO Reno both have similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A52 5G has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a screen that's very similar to the screen in OPPO Reno, although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite larger display and a little more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A52 5G has more memory for applications and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G counts with better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3765mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots slightly better photos and videos than OPPO Reno, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.