Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Green | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the OPPO Reno, with a general score of 91.1 against 72.8. Samsung Galaxy A52s's construction is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner than the OPPO Reno's, although it is just a little bit heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A52s features a screen that is very similar to the screen in OPPO Reno, although the Galaxy A52s also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a little bit larger display. The Galaxy A52s counts with a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s shoots just a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A52s counts with a better storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s features better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.