Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A6 is a bit better than OPPO Reno, getting a 75.8 score against 72.8. The Samsung Galaxy A6 design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno, although it was released around a year before. The OPPO Reno counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno also has 5 GB more RAM.
OPPO Reno features a much better display than Galaxy A6, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The OPPO Reno features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Reno counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same aperture, the OPPO Reno also has a much higher (4K) video definition, a much more mega pixels back camera and a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality. OPPO Reno has longer battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 3765mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.