Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is a bit better than the OPPO Reno, with a score of 76.9 against 72.8. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has older 10 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter cellphone than OPPO Reno, although they were released with only a couple months difference.
The OPPO Reno features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch in the screen. Galaxy A70 features slightly more storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Reno features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno also has more RAM. The Galaxy A70 features better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery size. The OPPO Reno features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video definition, a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno also has a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.