Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism bricks black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is way better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 overall score. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body is newer and a bit thinner than the OPPO Reno's, but it is just a little bit heavier.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a display that's very similar to the OPPO Reno one, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a greater memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW has greater battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.