Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-06-05 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C5 is a little bit better than OPPO Reno, with a 76.4 score against 72.8. Samsung Galaxy C5's design is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than the OPPO Reno, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C5 has older 6.0 Marshmallow version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The OPPO Reno counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a larger display.
The OPPO Reno takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments, a way better 48 megapixels resolution camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The OPPO Reno counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy C5, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Reno counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 3765mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.