Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Green | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy F62 is newer than OPPO Reno, it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 and OPPO Reno both count with really similar processing units, although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser processing cores (although faster). The Galaxy F62 features a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a much more mega-pixels camera.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3765mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.