Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Green | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than OPPO Reno, having a overall score of 97.6 against 72.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Although Galaxy Fold and the OPPO Reno were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy Fold's body is noticeably heavier but a lot thinner than the OPPO Reno.
Galaxy Fold features just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The OPPO Reno features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density.
OPPO Reno features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno also counts with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Galaxy Fold features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.