Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Green | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno, getting a score of 78.9 against 72.8. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M20 has the previous 10 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy M20 is a a bit heavier phone than OPPO Reno, but they have the same thickness.
OPPO Reno counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the OPPO Reno also counts with a quite larger screen. The OPPO Reno has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno has a very superior camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution, a way higher (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments.
The OPPO Reno counts with more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with greater battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3765mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.