Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 is better than OPPO Reno, having an 82.4 score against 72.8. Even when the Samsung Galaxy M30 and OPPO Reno were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy M30 is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The OPPO Reno has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno features a little more vivid display than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Reno also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with greater battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The OPPO Reno features a very superior camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a larger diafragm aperture, a much bigger sensor and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.