Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is a lot better than OPPO Reno, having a score of 87.7 against 72.8. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M51 has older 10 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy M51 is a newer phone than OPPO Reno, although it is heavier and a little bit thicker.
OPPO Reno counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the OPPO Reno also counts with a little greater screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy M51 features a processing unit that is just as good as the OPPO Reno one, and although the Galaxy M51 has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy M51 has a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.